Miami Hurricane

Search The Hurricane

Browse the archives

Keeping an open mind about incest

By: Daniel Drucker

Issue date: 4/14/08 Section: Opinion
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1

There is nothing quite like sophomore year of college. It is that pivotal time in your life when you begin solidifying your academic areas of study and you start to understand your identity, ideas and dreams. It is a time for experimentation and self-examination. As students, we are granted a time to question our long-standing acceptance and rejection of various societal norms and taboos. It is all a part of a process that makes us better, more well-rounded citizens.

Yet there is one issue we are indoctrinated to believe is beyond discourse. Those against its practice assume their superiority with a ripe arrogance, while those who believe in its merits are shunned and ridiculed mercilessly. I am, of course, talking about innocent, consenting, physical love between family members, or "incest," as the Puritans who run this society have called it.

In a society that values freedom and choice, we have shamefully allowed a select few - that is, those pencil-pushers up in Washington - to determine that incest is an immoral, terrible sin for all citizens. Some democracy we live in, huh?

But what is fundamentally wrong with this type of love? Ask the average person on the street, and they'll only stare at you blankly, or perhaps throw out some old, tired stereotype. "Incest produces terribly impaired, diseased children," or "Eww, that's gross! Why would anyone do that?" The former claim, that incest produces deficient children, is mostly unfounded, as well. Children born of familial love do have a higher risk for certain [genetic] syndromes, true, but they are, for the most part, normal.

Furthermore, if incest is so wrong, why did some of the most magnificent historical figures engage in it? Charles Darwin and Albert Einstein, equipped with two of the greatest minds in human history, had incestuous relationships with cousins, as did the Roosevelts. And if incest is a sin, why does the Bible depict Abraham's marriage to his sister being acceptable to God?

As a society we assume the moral impropriety of incest because we have always been told it is wrong. But why is it so wrong? Once you push through the cobwebs of ancient stereotypes and see incest for what it really is, it's hard to fathom the venom and animosity it continues to generate. It is that kind of opportunity for free thinking that makes sophomore year so wonderful, and it is that kind of open-mindedness that will liberate America and the rest of this world.

Daniel Drucker is a sophomore majoring in economics and political science. He may be contacted at d.drucker@umiami.edu.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 29

Willie

posted 4/14/08 @ 10:40 AM EST

Sarah was Abraham's half sister, not his sister. After Abimelech married Sarah once Abraham said that Sarah was his sister, God went to Abimelech and told him that Abraham had lied, and that Sarah was only Abraham's half sister. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

ted

posted 4/14/08 @ 11:21 AM EST

it's called satire

at least google your info first

posted 4/14/08 @ 1:01 PM EST

But it's crappy satire. I agree 100% with Willie, this guy just chose an edgy topic because that catches attention and gives his writing the illusion of an off-the-beaten-path, insightful style. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Art

posted 4/14/08 @ 4:26 PM EST

Incest is wrong because there is genetic effects caused by it. If society thought of it as being "OK" we would have one messed up world. I plan on being a father some day and I sure a hell don't want to worry about my son getting with my daughter. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Joshua

posted 4/14/08 @ 4:44 PM EST

I'm going to have to agree with Willie and Art. I definitely see the opportunity for satire here, but it was not executed well and seems to have the intentions of shocking the audience. (Continued…)

anonymous

posted 4/14/08 @ 8:48 PM EST

Funny thing is that even though everyone is bashing this article nobody is actually coming up with any good reasons as to why incest is wrong. The only thing anyone's saying is "OMG!!! that's disgusting!! ewwwwww". (Continued…)

Anonymous

posted 4/14/08 @ 9:42 PM EST

I second that, anonymous. This article has nothing to do with incest per se. It's merely poking fun at our society's closed-mindedness and given everyone's comments, it has proven just that - that you're all a bunch of dumbasses lacking any sort of insighfulness. (Continued…)

Dan Drucker

posted 4/14/08 @ 9:52 PM EST

The original title of the article was "Sophomore Year: Keeping an Open Mind." That title at least gave the piece a sense of surprise heading into the second paragraph. (Continued…)

Nathan

posted 4/15/08 @ 1:32 AM EST

Mr. Drucker, you're an idiot..There's a difference between having an open mind, and basically asking for something that is totally against sane thought. (Continued…)

Mr. Drucker

posted 4/15/08 @ 1:43 AM EST

1. It's a satire.

2. I took AP Biology in high school and received credit for it here.

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Issue Summary

Advertisement

Poll

What are your summer plans?
Submit Vote

View Results

Download Print Edition PDF

Advertisement